Ultraviolet and solar photocatalytic ozonation of municipal wastewater

Catalyst reuse, energy requirements and toxicity assessment

Achisa C. Mecha, Maurice S. Onyango, Aoyi Ochieng, Maggy N. B. Momba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study evaluated the treatment of municipal wastewater containing phenol using solar and ultraviolet (UV) light photocatalytic ozonation processes to explore comparative performance. Important aspects such as catalyst reuse, mineralization of pollutants, energy requirements, and toxicity of treated wastewater which are crucial for practical implementation of the processes were explored. The activity of the photocatalysts did not change significantly even after three consecutive uses despite approximately 2% of the initial quantity of catalyst being lost in each run. Analysis of the change in average oxidation state (AOS) demonstrated the formation of more oxidized degradation products (ΔAOS values of 1.0–1.7) due to mineralization. The energy requirements were determined in terms of electrical energy per order (EEO) and the collector area per order (ACO). The EEO (kWh m−3 Order−1) values were 26.2 for ozonation, 38–47 for UV photocatalysis and 7–22 for UV photocatalytic ozonation processes. On the other hand, ACO (m2 m−3 order−1) values were 31–69 for solar photocatalysis and 8–13 for solar photocatalytic ozonation. Thus photocatalytic ozonation processes required less energy input compared to the individual processes. The cytotoxicity of the wastewater was analysed using the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay with Vero cells. The cell viability increased from 28.7% in untreated wastewater to 80% in treated wastewater; thus showing that the treated wastewater was less toxic. The effectiveness of photocatalytic ozonation, recovery and reusability of the photocatalysts, as well as detoxification of the wastewater make this low energy consumption process attractive for wastewater remediation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-676
JournalChemosphere
Volume186
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Ozonization
Waste Water
Toxicity
Wastewater
catalyst
toxicity
wastewater
Catalysts
energy
Photocatalysis
Photocatalysts
mineralization
oxidation
Oxidation
Detoxification
Vero Cells
ozonation
Poisons
Reusability
Ultraviolet Rays

Cite this

@article{9c54acd3bc8a416ea54d76009a556dd3,
title = "Ultraviolet and solar photocatalytic ozonation of municipal wastewater: Catalyst reuse, energy requirements and toxicity assessment",
abstract = "The present study evaluated the treatment of municipal wastewater containing phenol using solar and ultraviolet (UV) light photocatalytic ozonation processes to explore comparative performance. Important aspects such as catalyst reuse, mineralization of pollutants, energy requirements, and toxicity of treated wastewater which are crucial for practical implementation of the processes were explored. The activity of the photocatalysts did not change significantly even after three consecutive uses despite approximately 2{\%} of the initial quantity of catalyst being lost in each run. Analysis of the change in average oxidation state (AOS) demonstrated the formation of more oxidized degradation products (ΔAOS values of 1.0–1.7) due to mineralization. The energy requirements were determined in terms of electrical energy per order (EEO) and the collector area per order (ACO). The EEO (kWh m−3 Order−1) values were 26.2 for ozonation, 38–47 for UV photocatalysis and 7–22 for UV photocatalytic ozonation processes. On the other hand, ACO (m2 m−3 order−1) values were 31–69 for solar photocatalysis and 8–13 for solar photocatalytic ozonation. Thus photocatalytic ozonation processes required less energy input compared to the individual processes. The cytotoxicity of the wastewater was analysed using the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay with Vero cells. The cell viability increased from 28.7{\%} in untreated wastewater to 80{\%} in treated wastewater; thus showing that the treated wastewater was less toxic. The effectiveness of photocatalytic ozonation, recovery and reusability of the photocatalysts, as well as detoxification of the wastewater make this low energy consumption process attractive for wastewater remediation.",
author = "Mecha, {Achisa C.} and Onyango, {Maurice S.} and Aoyi Ochieng and Momba, {Maggy N. B.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.041",
language = "English",
volume = "186",
pages = "669--676",
journal = "Chemosphere",
issn = "0045-6535",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Ultraviolet and solar photocatalytic ozonation of municipal wastewater : Catalyst reuse, energy requirements and toxicity assessment. / Mecha, Achisa C.; Onyango, Maurice S.; Ochieng, Aoyi; Momba, Maggy N. B.

In: Chemosphere, Vol. 186, 2017, p. 669-676.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultraviolet and solar photocatalytic ozonation of municipal wastewater

T2 - Catalyst reuse, energy requirements and toxicity assessment

AU - Mecha, Achisa C.

AU - Onyango, Maurice S.

AU - Ochieng, Aoyi

AU - Momba, Maggy N. B.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The present study evaluated the treatment of municipal wastewater containing phenol using solar and ultraviolet (UV) light photocatalytic ozonation processes to explore comparative performance. Important aspects such as catalyst reuse, mineralization of pollutants, energy requirements, and toxicity of treated wastewater which are crucial for practical implementation of the processes were explored. The activity of the photocatalysts did not change significantly even after three consecutive uses despite approximately 2% of the initial quantity of catalyst being lost in each run. Analysis of the change in average oxidation state (AOS) demonstrated the formation of more oxidized degradation products (ΔAOS values of 1.0–1.7) due to mineralization. The energy requirements were determined in terms of electrical energy per order (EEO) and the collector area per order (ACO). The EEO (kWh m−3 Order−1) values were 26.2 for ozonation, 38–47 for UV photocatalysis and 7–22 for UV photocatalytic ozonation processes. On the other hand, ACO (m2 m−3 order−1) values were 31–69 for solar photocatalysis and 8–13 for solar photocatalytic ozonation. Thus photocatalytic ozonation processes required less energy input compared to the individual processes. The cytotoxicity of the wastewater was analysed using the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay with Vero cells. The cell viability increased from 28.7% in untreated wastewater to 80% in treated wastewater; thus showing that the treated wastewater was less toxic. The effectiveness of photocatalytic ozonation, recovery and reusability of the photocatalysts, as well as detoxification of the wastewater make this low energy consumption process attractive for wastewater remediation.

AB - The present study evaluated the treatment of municipal wastewater containing phenol using solar and ultraviolet (UV) light photocatalytic ozonation processes to explore comparative performance. Important aspects such as catalyst reuse, mineralization of pollutants, energy requirements, and toxicity of treated wastewater which are crucial for practical implementation of the processes were explored. The activity of the photocatalysts did not change significantly even after three consecutive uses despite approximately 2% of the initial quantity of catalyst being lost in each run. Analysis of the change in average oxidation state (AOS) demonstrated the formation of more oxidized degradation products (ΔAOS values of 1.0–1.7) due to mineralization. The energy requirements were determined in terms of electrical energy per order (EEO) and the collector area per order (ACO). The EEO (kWh m−3 Order−1) values were 26.2 for ozonation, 38–47 for UV photocatalysis and 7–22 for UV photocatalytic ozonation processes. On the other hand, ACO (m2 m−3 order−1) values were 31–69 for solar photocatalysis and 8–13 for solar photocatalytic ozonation. Thus photocatalytic ozonation processes required less energy input compared to the individual processes. The cytotoxicity of the wastewater was analysed using the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay with Vero cells. The cell viability increased from 28.7% in untreated wastewater to 80% in treated wastewater; thus showing that the treated wastewater was less toxic. The effectiveness of photocatalytic ozonation, recovery and reusability of the photocatalysts, as well as detoxification of the wastewater make this low energy consumption process attractive for wastewater remediation.

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.041

DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.041

M3 - Article

VL - 186

SP - 669

EP - 676

JO - Chemosphere

JF - Chemosphere

SN - 0045-6535

ER -