To pay or not to pay: Access to spatial data from user perspective

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

    Abstract

    User access to geographic data has never been a straightforward process, not because the problem is technologically intractable but rather due to the matter of having appropriate funding models in place. Since the proponents of both free access and paid access pricing models put forward equally viable arguments, policymakers are left undecided about which funding model to choose. Going beyond whether users should pay for geographic data produced by government establishments, this assessment of Rwanda contributes to the age-long debate by examining the willingness of users themselves to pay. The results show that a user’s willingness to pay for geographic data is not determined hedonically. Instead, the most influencing factor is the organisation’s particular area of focus; willingness varies depending on whether the activities are commercial, humanitarian or educational in outlook or mandated legally such as is the case for government institutions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages27-29
    Volume27
    No.9
    Specialist publicationGIM International
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    funding
    Rwanda
    willingness to pay
    pricing

    Cite this

    @misc{5a57d5e155f74874ab3f0518207b7cf3,
    title = "To pay or not to pay: Access to spatial data from user perspective",
    abstract = "User access to geographic data has never been a straightforward process, not because the problem is technologically intractable but rather due to the matter of having appropriate funding models in place. Since the proponents of both free access and paid access pricing models put forward equally viable arguments, policymakers are left undecided about which funding model to choose. Going beyond whether users should pay for geographic data produced by government establishments, this assessment of Rwanda contributes to the age-long debate by examining the willingness of users themselves to pay. The results show that a user’s willingness to pay for geographic data is not determined hedonically. Instead, the most influencing factor is the organisation’s particular area of focus; willingness varies depending on whether the activities are commercial, humanitarian or educational in outlook or mandated legally such as is the case for government institutions.",
    author = "Akinyemi, {Felicia O.}",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "27--29",
    journal = "GIM International",
    issn = "1566-9076",
    publisher = "GITC B.V.",

    }

    To pay or not to pay: Access to spatial data from user perspective. / Akinyemi, Felicia O.

    In: GIM International, Vol. 27, No. 9, 2013, p. 27-29.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

    TY - GEN

    T1 - To pay or not to pay: Access to spatial data from user perspective

    AU - Akinyemi, Felicia O.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - User access to geographic data has never been a straightforward process, not because the problem is technologically intractable but rather due to the matter of having appropriate funding models in place. Since the proponents of both free access and paid access pricing models put forward equally viable arguments, policymakers are left undecided about which funding model to choose. Going beyond whether users should pay for geographic data produced by government establishments, this assessment of Rwanda contributes to the age-long debate by examining the willingness of users themselves to pay. The results show that a user’s willingness to pay for geographic data is not determined hedonically. Instead, the most influencing factor is the organisation’s particular area of focus; willingness varies depending on whether the activities are commercial, humanitarian or educational in outlook or mandated legally such as is the case for government institutions.

    AB - User access to geographic data has never been a straightforward process, not because the problem is technologically intractable but rather due to the matter of having appropriate funding models in place. Since the proponents of both free access and paid access pricing models put forward equally viable arguments, policymakers are left undecided about which funding model to choose. Going beyond whether users should pay for geographic data produced by government establishments, this assessment of Rwanda contributes to the age-long debate by examining the willingness of users themselves to pay. The results show that a user’s willingness to pay for geographic data is not determined hedonically. Instead, the most influencing factor is the organisation’s particular area of focus; willingness varies depending on whether the activities are commercial, humanitarian or educational in outlook or mandated legally such as is the case for government institutions.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 27

    EP - 29

    JO - GIM International

    JF - GIM International

    SN - 1566-9076

    ER -