Techno-economical assessment of coal and biomass gasification-based hydrogen production supply chain system

Mirela Muresan, Calin Cristian Cormos, Paul Serban Agachi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hydrogen is an energy carrier that represents a possible clean fuel of the future. This paper assesses the effect of biomass co-firing on gasification based hydrogen production supply chain, with carbon dioxide capture and storage, from technical, economical and environmental point of view. Several cases consisting of various feedstocks to the gasification reactor are investigated (coal only and coal in mixture with sawdust or wheat straw). Considered plant concepts generate between 330 and 460. MW hydrogen of 99.99% (vol.) purity.First a performance analysis regarding the energy efficiency of the process, the syngas composition and the carbon dioxide capture rate is carried out. The simulations are made using chemical process simulation software Aspen Plus. Second, total capital investment and operating costs for the gasification plant are evaluated. Finally, using the results from Aspen Plus simulations and the cost estimations, a discrete event model is developed, to address hydrogen production supply chain analysis under demand variability, with Arena software. The implications of biomass co-firing on the system are evaluated in terms of: hydrogen amount sold and hydrogen amount stored (MW), hydrogen lost sales amount (MW), partial sales percent and gasification plant profit.The results show that as the biomass quantity in the feedstock increases the hydrogen production rate decreases by 9-28% for sawdust, respectively by 7-23% for wheat straw. The energy efficiency of the process and the gasification plant profit also decrease, but the CO2 emissions are lower for the cases of biomass co-firing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1527-1541
Number of pages15
JournalChemical Engineering Research and Design
Volume91
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2013

Fingerprint

Coal
Hydrogen production
Gasification
Supply chains
Hydrogen
Biomass
Sawdust
Straw
Carbon Dioxide
Feedstocks
Energy efficiency
Carbon dioxide
Profitability
Sales
Operating costs
Chemical analysis
Costs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{6425b3625b9a49668a785535725fecc5,
title = "Techno-economical assessment of coal and biomass gasification-based hydrogen production supply chain system",
abstract = "Hydrogen is an energy carrier that represents a possible clean fuel of the future. This paper assesses the effect of biomass co-firing on gasification based hydrogen production supply chain, with carbon dioxide capture and storage, from technical, economical and environmental point of view. Several cases consisting of various feedstocks to the gasification reactor are investigated (coal only and coal in mixture with sawdust or wheat straw). Considered plant concepts generate between 330 and 460. MW hydrogen of 99.99{\%} (vol.) purity.First a performance analysis regarding the energy efficiency of the process, the syngas composition and the carbon dioxide capture rate is carried out. The simulations are made using chemical process simulation software Aspen Plus. Second, total capital investment and operating costs for the gasification plant are evaluated. Finally, using the results from Aspen Plus simulations and the cost estimations, a discrete event model is developed, to address hydrogen production supply chain analysis under demand variability, with Arena software. The implications of biomass co-firing on the system are evaluated in terms of: hydrogen amount sold and hydrogen amount stored (MW), hydrogen lost sales amount (MW), partial sales percent and gasification plant profit.The results show that as the biomass quantity in the feedstock increases the hydrogen production rate decreases by 9-28{\%} for sawdust, respectively by 7-23{\%} for wheat straw. The energy efficiency of the process and the gasification plant profit also decrease, but the CO2 emissions are lower for the cases of biomass co-firing.",
author = "Mirela Muresan and Cormos, {Calin Cristian} and Agachi, {Paul Serban}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cherd.2013.02.018",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "1527--1541",
journal = "Chemical Engineering Research and Design",
issn = "0263-8762",
publisher = "Institution of Chemical Engineers",
number = "8",

}

Techno-economical assessment of coal and biomass gasification-based hydrogen production supply chain system. / Muresan, Mirela; Cormos, Calin Cristian; Agachi, Paul Serban.

In: Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 91, No. 8, 01.08.2013, p. 1527-1541.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Techno-economical assessment of coal and biomass gasification-based hydrogen production supply chain system

AU - Muresan, Mirela

AU - Cormos, Calin Cristian

AU - Agachi, Paul Serban

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - Hydrogen is an energy carrier that represents a possible clean fuel of the future. This paper assesses the effect of biomass co-firing on gasification based hydrogen production supply chain, with carbon dioxide capture and storage, from technical, economical and environmental point of view. Several cases consisting of various feedstocks to the gasification reactor are investigated (coal only and coal in mixture with sawdust or wheat straw). Considered plant concepts generate between 330 and 460. MW hydrogen of 99.99% (vol.) purity.First a performance analysis regarding the energy efficiency of the process, the syngas composition and the carbon dioxide capture rate is carried out. The simulations are made using chemical process simulation software Aspen Plus. Second, total capital investment and operating costs for the gasification plant are evaluated. Finally, using the results from Aspen Plus simulations and the cost estimations, a discrete event model is developed, to address hydrogen production supply chain analysis under demand variability, with Arena software. The implications of biomass co-firing on the system are evaluated in terms of: hydrogen amount sold and hydrogen amount stored (MW), hydrogen lost sales amount (MW), partial sales percent and gasification plant profit.The results show that as the biomass quantity in the feedstock increases the hydrogen production rate decreases by 9-28% for sawdust, respectively by 7-23% for wheat straw. The energy efficiency of the process and the gasification plant profit also decrease, but the CO2 emissions are lower for the cases of biomass co-firing.

AB - Hydrogen is an energy carrier that represents a possible clean fuel of the future. This paper assesses the effect of biomass co-firing on gasification based hydrogen production supply chain, with carbon dioxide capture and storage, from technical, economical and environmental point of view. Several cases consisting of various feedstocks to the gasification reactor are investigated (coal only and coal in mixture with sawdust or wheat straw). Considered plant concepts generate between 330 and 460. MW hydrogen of 99.99% (vol.) purity.First a performance analysis regarding the energy efficiency of the process, the syngas composition and the carbon dioxide capture rate is carried out. The simulations are made using chemical process simulation software Aspen Plus. Second, total capital investment and operating costs for the gasification plant are evaluated. Finally, using the results from Aspen Plus simulations and the cost estimations, a discrete event model is developed, to address hydrogen production supply chain analysis under demand variability, with Arena software. The implications of biomass co-firing on the system are evaluated in terms of: hydrogen amount sold and hydrogen amount stored (MW), hydrogen lost sales amount (MW), partial sales percent and gasification plant profit.The results show that as the biomass quantity in the feedstock increases the hydrogen production rate decreases by 9-28% for sawdust, respectively by 7-23% for wheat straw. The energy efficiency of the process and the gasification plant profit also decrease, but the CO2 emissions are lower for the cases of biomass co-firing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881545065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881545065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cherd.2013.02.018

DO - 10.1016/j.cherd.2013.02.018

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 1527

EP - 1541

JO - Chemical Engineering Research and Design

JF - Chemical Engineering Research and Design

SN - 0263-8762

IS - 8

ER -