Stochastic analysis of monthly streamflows

E. M. Lungu, F. T.K. Sefe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Monthly runoff sequences from catchments in southeastern Botswana were subjected to stochastic analysis. It was found that the stochastic component accounted for 63-80% of the variance in the log-transformed monthly runoff sequences. The stochastic component behaved as an autoregressive process of order 3, i.e. AR(3) for all the stations and was found to be greatly dominated by first-order persistence trends with the first-order autoregressive parameters ranging from 0.54 to 0.96. The contribution of higher-order persistence terms, by contrast, was found to be fairly uniform for all the stations. Total monthly runoff sequences, on the other hand, behaved as an integrated moving average process (IMA(0,1,2)) for all the stations. This model performed satisfactorily for forecasting total monthly flows for up to 12 months lead time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-182
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Hydrology
Volume126
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

streamflow
runoff
persistence
catchment
analysis
station
trend
parameter

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Lungu, E. M. ; Sefe, F. T.K. / Stochastic analysis of monthly streamflows. In: Journal of Hydrology. 1991 ; Vol. 126, No. 3-4. pp. 171-182.
@article{897c9b2a18ac469ca3764d9c9cc638c3,
title = "Stochastic analysis of monthly streamflows",
abstract = "Monthly runoff sequences from catchments in southeastern Botswana were subjected to stochastic analysis. It was found that the stochastic component accounted for 63-80{\%} of the variance in the log-transformed monthly runoff sequences. The stochastic component behaved as an autoregressive process of order 3, i.e. AR(3) for all the stations and was found to be greatly dominated by first-order persistence trends with the first-order autoregressive parameters ranging from 0.54 to 0.96. The contribution of higher-order persistence terms, by contrast, was found to be fairly uniform for all the stations. Total monthly runoff sequences, on the other hand, behaved as an integrated moving average process (IMA(0,1,2)) for all the stations. This model performed satisfactorily for forecasting total monthly flows for up to 12 months lead time.",
author = "Lungu, {E. M.} and Sefe, {F. T.K.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0022-1694(91)90154-A",
language = "English",
volume = "126",
pages = "171--182",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3-4",

}

Stochastic analysis of monthly streamflows. / Lungu, E. M.; Sefe, F. T.K.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 126, No. 3-4, 01.01.1991, p. 171-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stochastic analysis of monthly streamflows

AU - Lungu, E. M.

AU - Sefe, F. T.K.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Monthly runoff sequences from catchments in southeastern Botswana were subjected to stochastic analysis. It was found that the stochastic component accounted for 63-80% of the variance in the log-transformed monthly runoff sequences. The stochastic component behaved as an autoregressive process of order 3, i.e. AR(3) for all the stations and was found to be greatly dominated by first-order persistence trends with the first-order autoregressive parameters ranging from 0.54 to 0.96. The contribution of higher-order persistence terms, by contrast, was found to be fairly uniform for all the stations. Total monthly runoff sequences, on the other hand, behaved as an integrated moving average process (IMA(0,1,2)) for all the stations. This model performed satisfactorily for forecasting total monthly flows for up to 12 months lead time.

AB - Monthly runoff sequences from catchments in southeastern Botswana were subjected to stochastic analysis. It was found that the stochastic component accounted for 63-80% of the variance in the log-transformed monthly runoff sequences. The stochastic component behaved as an autoregressive process of order 3, i.e. AR(3) for all the stations and was found to be greatly dominated by first-order persistence trends with the first-order autoregressive parameters ranging from 0.54 to 0.96. The contribution of higher-order persistence terms, by contrast, was found to be fairly uniform for all the stations. Total monthly runoff sequences, on the other hand, behaved as an integrated moving average process (IMA(0,1,2)) for all the stations. This model performed satisfactorily for forecasting total monthly flows for up to 12 months lead time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026358734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026358734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0022-1694(91)90154-A

DO - 10.1016/0022-1694(91)90154-A

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026358734

VL - 126

SP - 171

EP - 182

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

IS - 3-4

ER -