Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame

Alechenu Audu Aboje, Mohammed Umar Garba, Ambali Saka Abdulkareem, Edison Muzenda, Aisha Abubakar Faruq, Geun Young Yun (Editor)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A comparison of turbulence and combustion models have been performed for predicting CO2 and NOx formation from a methane diffusion flame firing vertically upwards. The flow field has been modeled using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equation incorporating the k-ε realizable turbulence closure model, the k-ω shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model and the transitional SST turbulence model and the three models have been compared. Combustion was modeled using the unsteady Stationary Laminar Flamelet Model (SLFM), the Eulerian Particle Flamelet Model (EPFM), and the Pollutant Model (PM) and the three models have also been compared. Numerical predictions show good agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, the experimental data showed that the k-ε realizable turbulence model and the k-ω SST turbulence model performed better than transitional SST model in predicting the pollutant species from the flame. The result also shows that the PM performed better than flamelet models in predicting the combustion characteristics of NOX in the flame.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1302543
JournalCogent Environmental Science
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

modeling
turbulence
shear stress
combustion
pollutant formation
pollutant
flow field
methane
prediction

Cite this

Aboje, Alechenu Audu ; Garba, Mohammed Umar ; Abdulkareem, Ambali Saka ; Muzenda, Edison ; Faruq, Aisha Abubakar ; Yun, Geun Young (Editor). / Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame. In: Cogent Environmental Science . 2017 ; Vol. 3, No. 1.
@article{940fab83f5b34ab0a3226d212f038164,
title = "Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame",
abstract = "A comparison of turbulence and combustion models have been performed for predicting CO2 and NOx formation from a methane diffusion flame firing vertically upwards. The flow field has been modeled using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equation incorporating the k-ε realizable turbulence closure model, the k-ω shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model and the transitional SST turbulence model and the three models have been compared. Combustion was modeled using the unsteady Stationary Laminar Flamelet Model (SLFM), the Eulerian Particle Flamelet Model (EPFM), and the Pollutant Model (PM) and the three models have also been compared. Numerical predictions show good agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, the experimental data showed that the k-ε realizable turbulence model and the k-ω SST turbulence model performed better than transitional SST model in predicting the pollutant species from the flame. The result also shows that the PM performed better than flamelet models in predicting the combustion characteristics of NOX in the flame.",
author = "Aboje, {Alechenu Audu} and Garba, {Mohammed Umar} and Abdulkareem, {Ambali Saka} and Edison Muzenda and Faruq, {Aisha Abubakar} and Yun, {Geun Young}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/23311843.2017.1302543",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Cogent Environmental Science",
issn = "2331-1843",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame. / Aboje, Alechenu Audu; Garba, Mohammed Umar; Abdulkareem, Ambali Saka; Muzenda, Edison; Faruq, Aisha Abubakar; Yun, Geun Young (Editor).

In: Cogent Environmental Science , Vol. 3, No. 1, 1302543, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame

AU - Aboje, Alechenu Audu

AU - Garba, Mohammed Umar

AU - Abdulkareem, Ambali Saka

AU - Muzenda, Edison

AU - Faruq, Aisha Abubakar

A2 - Yun, Geun Young

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - A comparison of turbulence and combustion models have been performed for predicting CO2 and NOx formation from a methane diffusion flame firing vertically upwards. The flow field has been modeled using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equation incorporating the k-ε realizable turbulence closure model, the k-ω shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model and the transitional SST turbulence model and the three models have been compared. Combustion was modeled using the unsteady Stationary Laminar Flamelet Model (SLFM), the Eulerian Particle Flamelet Model (EPFM), and the Pollutant Model (PM) and the three models have also been compared. Numerical predictions show good agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, the experimental data showed that the k-ε realizable turbulence model and the k-ω SST turbulence model performed better than transitional SST model in predicting the pollutant species from the flame. The result also shows that the PM performed better than flamelet models in predicting the combustion characteristics of NOX in the flame.

AB - A comparison of turbulence and combustion models have been performed for predicting CO2 and NOx formation from a methane diffusion flame firing vertically upwards. The flow field has been modeled using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equation incorporating the k-ε realizable turbulence closure model, the k-ω shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model and the transitional SST turbulence model and the three models have been compared. Combustion was modeled using the unsteady Stationary Laminar Flamelet Model (SLFM), the Eulerian Particle Flamelet Model (EPFM), and the Pollutant Model (PM) and the three models have also been compared. Numerical predictions show good agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, the experimental data showed that the k-ε realizable turbulence model and the k-ω SST turbulence model performed better than transitional SST model in predicting the pollutant species from the flame. The result also shows that the PM performed better than flamelet models in predicting the combustion characteristics of NOX in the flame.

U2 - 10.1080/23311843.2017.1302543

DO - 10.1080/23311843.2017.1302543

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Cogent Environmental Science

JF - Cogent Environmental Science

SN - 2331-1843

IS - 1

M1 - 1302543

ER -