New Concepts of Quality Assurance in Analytical Chemistry: Will They Influence the Way We Conduct Science in General?

Jens E.T. Andersen, Sidsel Marie Glasdam, Daniel Bo Larsen, Nicolaas Molenaar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to the guide Vocabulary in Metrology (VIM3) (JCGM, 2008), the definition of the concepts of trueness and accuracy has been revised, which has an important impact on analytical chemistry. Additionally, Eurachem/CITAC has published a new edition of the guide to Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement (QUAM) (CITAC and Eurachem, 2012). These two documents, together, form a new basis for the evaluation of data. Results of prominent technologies of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), for determination of chloride-isotope ratios (35Cl/37Cl) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for determination of sodium, were evaluated in terms of the true level of uncertainty and revealed a genuine problem for science that was not addressed in VIM3 and QUAM. Comparison of theory and experimentation definitely requires statistical tools, but in contemporary science two approaches to the implementation of statistics in decision making are used: 1. Short-term precision and 2. long-term precision. Both approaches are valid and both are described using the same methods of statistics. However, they lead to completely different conclusions and decisions. Despite good intentions and new concepts, as well as practices and procedures for quality assurance, it is shown by these two examples that these efforts may be inadequate or mislead scientists into making major mistakes in the decision-making process. A set of equations is supplied, which are based on the propagation of uncertainty, and the implication of results and conclusions for other fields of science is discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1582-1590
Number of pages9
JournalChemical Engineering Communications
Volume203
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Quality assurance
Chemical analysis
Decision making
Statistics
Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
Inductively coupled plasma
Isotopes
Spectrometry
Chlorides
Sodium
Uncertainty

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)

Cite this

Andersen, Jens E.T. ; Glasdam, Sidsel Marie ; Larsen, Daniel Bo ; Molenaar, Nicolaas. / New Concepts of Quality Assurance in Analytical Chemistry : Will They Influence the Way We Conduct Science in General?. In: Chemical Engineering Communications. 2016 ; Vol. 203, No. 12. pp. 1582-1590.
@article{a2f5106810ff4fc0bc44677a3d9c614b,
title = "New Concepts of Quality Assurance in Analytical Chemistry: Will They Influence the Way We Conduct Science in General?",
abstract = "According to the guide Vocabulary in Metrology (VIM3) (JCGM, 2008), the definition of the concepts of trueness and accuracy has been revised, which has an important impact on analytical chemistry. Additionally, Eurachem/CITAC has published a new edition of the guide to Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement (QUAM) (CITAC and Eurachem, 2012). These two documents, together, form a new basis for the evaluation of data. Results of prominent technologies of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), for determination of chloride-isotope ratios (35Cl/37Cl) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for determination of sodium, were evaluated in terms of the true level of uncertainty and revealed a genuine problem for science that was not addressed in VIM3 and QUAM. Comparison of theory and experimentation definitely requires statistical tools, but in contemporary science two approaches to the implementation of statistics in decision making are used: 1. Short-term precision and 2. long-term precision. Both approaches are valid and both are described using the same methods of statistics. However, they lead to completely different conclusions and decisions. Despite good intentions and new concepts, as well as practices and procedures for quality assurance, it is shown by these two examples that these efforts may be inadequate or mislead scientists into making major mistakes in the decision-making process. A set of equations is supplied, which are based on the propagation of uncertainty, and the implication of results and conclusions for other fields of science is discussed.",
author = "Andersen, {Jens E.T.} and Glasdam, {Sidsel Marie} and Larsen, {Daniel Bo} and Nicolaas Molenaar",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00986445.2016.1180290",
language = "English",
volume = "203",
pages = "1582--1590",
journal = "Chemical Engineering Communications",
issn = "0098-6445",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

New Concepts of Quality Assurance in Analytical Chemistry : Will They Influence the Way We Conduct Science in General? / Andersen, Jens E.T.; Glasdam, Sidsel Marie; Larsen, Daniel Bo; Molenaar, Nicolaas.

In: Chemical Engineering Communications, Vol. 203, No. 12, 01.12.2016, p. 1582-1590.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - New Concepts of Quality Assurance in Analytical Chemistry

T2 - Will They Influence the Way We Conduct Science in General?

AU - Andersen, Jens E.T.

AU - Glasdam, Sidsel Marie

AU - Larsen, Daniel Bo

AU - Molenaar, Nicolaas

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - According to the guide Vocabulary in Metrology (VIM3) (JCGM, 2008), the definition of the concepts of trueness and accuracy has been revised, which has an important impact on analytical chemistry. Additionally, Eurachem/CITAC has published a new edition of the guide to Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement (QUAM) (CITAC and Eurachem, 2012). These two documents, together, form a new basis for the evaluation of data. Results of prominent technologies of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), for determination of chloride-isotope ratios (35Cl/37Cl) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for determination of sodium, were evaluated in terms of the true level of uncertainty and revealed a genuine problem for science that was not addressed in VIM3 and QUAM. Comparison of theory and experimentation definitely requires statistical tools, but in contemporary science two approaches to the implementation of statistics in decision making are used: 1. Short-term precision and 2. long-term precision. Both approaches are valid and both are described using the same methods of statistics. However, they lead to completely different conclusions and decisions. Despite good intentions and new concepts, as well as practices and procedures for quality assurance, it is shown by these two examples that these efforts may be inadequate or mislead scientists into making major mistakes in the decision-making process. A set of equations is supplied, which are based on the propagation of uncertainty, and the implication of results and conclusions for other fields of science is discussed.

AB - According to the guide Vocabulary in Metrology (VIM3) (JCGM, 2008), the definition of the concepts of trueness and accuracy has been revised, which has an important impact on analytical chemistry. Additionally, Eurachem/CITAC has published a new edition of the guide to Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement (QUAM) (CITAC and Eurachem, 2012). These two documents, together, form a new basis for the evaluation of data. Results of prominent technologies of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), for determination of chloride-isotope ratios (35Cl/37Cl) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for determination of sodium, were evaluated in terms of the true level of uncertainty and revealed a genuine problem for science that was not addressed in VIM3 and QUAM. Comparison of theory and experimentation definitely requires statistical tools, but in contemporary science two approaches to the implementation of statistics in decision making are used: 1. Short-term precision and 2. long-term precision. Both approaches are valid and both are described using the same methods of statistics. However, they lead to completely different conclusions and decisions. Despite good intentions and new concepts, as well as practices and procedures for quality assurance, it is shown by these two examples that these efforts may be inadequate or mislead scientists into making major mistakes in the decision-making process. A set of equations is supplied, which are based on the propagation of uncertainty, and the implication of results and conclusions for other fields of science is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992694436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992694436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00986445.2016.1180290

DO - 10.1080/00986445.2016.1180290

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84992694436

VL - 203

SP - 1582

EP - 1590

JO - Chemical Engineering Communications

JF - Chemical Engineering Communications

SN - 0098-6445

IS - 12

ER -