Evaluation of correct knowledge of key danger signs in pregnancy among antenatal clinic attendees at a tertiary health facility in Nigeria

I. O. Morhason-Bello, A. F. Fagbamigbe, T. O. Mumuni, O. A. Adesina, A. R. Abdus-Salam, A. Ifemeje, O. A. Ojengbede

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Test of knowledge of pregnant women on key danger signs as a marker to assess the quality of information shared during health education at the antenatal clinic (ANC) is desirable. Aim: The aim was to assess correct knowledge of danger signs among pregnant women who attend ANC. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional design conducted among pregnant women at the ANC of the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: A pretested structured questionnaire that contains sociodemographics, past obstetrics history, and a list of test questions to assess correct knowledge of danger signs was administered to each consenting participant. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. The knowledge score of key danger signs in pregnancy (KDSP) was measured on a scale of 0-7 and participants were scored as having poor (0-2), fair (3-4), or good (5-7) knowledge. The reliability of the questionnaire to assess knowledge score was determined with Cronbach's alpha. Statistical significance was set 5%. STATA 12.0 Software was used. Results: The mean age of respondents was 30.28 ± 4.56 with the majority (75.1%) of respondents aged 26-35 years. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.871. In general, the knowledge score was good and the associated factors on bivariate analysis were younger age (P = 0.028), Islamic religion (P = 0.048), ethnicity (P = 0.03), professional occupation (P = 0.01), and previous attendance of health talk on KDSP (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: There was a high knowledge score of KDSP, but some still have some misconceptions that need to be addressed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-232
Number of pages6
JournalNigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Health Facilities
Nigeria
Pregnant Women
Pregnancy
Religion
Health Education
Occupations
Obstetrics
Software
History
Surveys and Questionnaires
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Morhason-Bello, I. O. ; Fagbamigbe, A. F. ; Mumuni, T. O. ; Adesina, O. A. ; Abdus-Salam, A. R. ; Ifemeje, A. ; Ojengbede, O. A. / Evaluation of correct knowledge of key danger signs in pregnancy among antenatal clinic attendees at a tertiary health facility in Nigeria. In: Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2016 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 227-232.
@article{d1a932c56bb24af3926c50a76876bae5,
title = "Evaluation of correct knowledge of key danger signs in pregnancy among antenatal clinic attendees at a tertiary health facility in Nigeria",
abstract = "Context: Test of knowledge of pregnant women on key danger signs as a marker to assess the quality of information shared during health education at the antenatal clinic (ANC) is desirable. Aim: The aim was to assess correct knowledge of danger signs among pregnant women who attend ANC. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional design conducted among pregnant women at the ANC of the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: A pretested structured questionnaire that contains sociodemographics, past obstetrics history, and a list of test questions to assess correct knowledge of danger signs was administered to each consenting participant. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. The knowledge score of key danger signs in pregnancy (KDSP) was measured on a scale of 0-7 and participants were scored as having poor (0-2), fair (3-4), or good (5-7) knowledge. The reliability of the questionnaire to assess knowledge score was determined with Cronbach's alpha. Statistical significance was set 5{\%}. STATA 12.0 Software was used. Results: The mean age of respondents was 30.28 ± 4.56 with the majority (75.1{\%}) of respondents aged 26-35 years. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.871. In general, the knowledge score was good and the associated factors on bivariate analysis were younger age (P = 0.028), Islamic religion (P = 0.048), ethnicity (P = 0.03), professional occupation (P = 0.01), and previous attendance of health talk on KDSP (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: There was a high knowledge score of KDSP, but some still have some misconceptions that need to be addressed.",
author = "Morhason-Bello, {I. O.} and Fagbamigbe, {A. F.} and Mumuni, {T. O.} and Adesina, {O. A.} and Abdus-Salam, {A. R.} and A. Ifemeje and Ojengbede, {O. A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/1119-3077.164347",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "227--232",
journal = "Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice",
issn = "1119-3077",
publisher = "Medical and Dental Consultants Association of Nigeria (MDCAN)",
number = "2",

}

Evaluation of correct knowledge of key danger signs in pregnancy among antenatal clinic attendees at a tertiary health facility in Nigeria. / Morhason-Bello, I. O.; Fagbamigbe, A. F.; Mumuni, T. O.; Adesina, O. A.; Abdus-Salam, A. R.; Ifemeje, A.; Ojengbede, O. A.

In: Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, Vol. 19, No. 2, 01.03.2016, p. 227-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of correct knowledge of key danger signs in pregnancy among antenatal clinic attendees at a tertiary health facility in Nigeria

AU - Morhason-Bello, I. O.

AU - Fagbamigbe, A. F.

AU - Mumuni, T. O.

AU - Adesina, O. A.

AU - Abdus-Salam, A. R.

AU - Ifemeje, A.

AU - Ojengbede, O. A.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Context: Test of knowledge of pregnant women on key danger signs as a marker to assess the quality of information shared during health education at the antenatal clinic (ANC) is desirable. Aim: The aim was to assess correct knowledge of danger signs among pregnant women who attend ANC. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional design conducted among pregnant women at the ANC of the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: A pretested structured questionnaire that contains sociodemographics, past obstetrics history, and a list of test questions to assess correct knowledge of danger signs was administered to each consenting participant. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. The knowledge score of key danger signs in pregnancy (KDSP) was measured on a scale of 0-7 and participants were scored as having poor (0-2), fair (3-4), or good (5-7) knowledge. The reliability of the questionnaire to assess knowledge score was determined with Cronbach's alpha. Statistical significance was set 5%. STATA 12.0 Software was used. Results: The mean age of respondents was 30.28 ± 4.56 with the majority (75.1%) of respondents aged 26-35 years. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.871. In general, the knowledge score was good and the associated factors on bivariate analysis were younger age (P = 0.028), Islamic religion (P = 0.048), ethnicity (P = 0.03), professional occupation (P = 0.01), and previous attendance of health talk on KDSP (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: There was a high knowledge score of KDSP, but some still have some misconceptions that need to be addressed.

AB - Context: Test of knowledge of pregnant women on key danger signs as a marker to assess the quality of information shared during health education at the antenatal clinic (ANC) is desirable. Aim: The aim was to assess correct knowledge of danger signs among pregnant women who attend ANC. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional design conducted among pregnant women at the ANC of the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: A pretested structured questionnaire that contains sociodemographics, past obstetrics history, and a list of test questions to assess correct knowledge of danger signs was administered to each consenting participant. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. The knowledge score of key danger signs in pregnancy (KDSP) was measured on a scale of 0-7 and participants were scored as having poor (0-2), fair (3-4), or good (5-7) knowledge. The reliability of the questionnaire to assess knowledge score was determined with Cronbach's alpha. Statistical significance was set 5%. STATA 12.0 Software was used. Results: The mean age of respondents was 30.28 ± 4.56 with the majority (75.1%) of respondents aged 26-35 years. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.871. In general, the knowledge score was good and the associated factors on bivariate analysis were younger age (P = 0.028), Islamic religion (P = 0.048), ethnicity (P = 0.03), professional occupation (P = 0.01), and previous attendance of health talk on KDSP (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: There was a high knowledge score of KDSP, but some still have some misconceptions that need to be addressed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958953605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958953605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/1119-3077.164347

DO - 10.4103/1119-3077.164347

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 227

EP - 232

JO - Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice

JF - Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice

SN - 1119-3077

IS - 2

ER -