Economic analysis of biogas upgrading and utilization as vehicular fuel in South Africa

S. O. Masebinu, A. O. Aboyade, E. Muzenda

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Economic and sensitivity analysis of a simulated biogas upgrading plant using a gas permeation software has been presented in this study. The effect of three process conditions on gas processing cost (GPC) were simulated. An increase in CO2 increased the GPC from $0.73 to $1.39/m3 of biomethane while an increase in feed pressure increased GPC from $0.65 to $1.16/m3 of biomethane. As the feed flow rate increased from 80-140 m3/h, the product flow rate increased from 46-100 m3/h while the GPC decreases from $0.79 to $0.39/m3 of biomethane. At optimized condition, the calculated GPC was $0.46/m3 of biomethane. The NPV, IRR and BCR for producing biomethane was R15,240,343, 22.41% and 2.0S respectively with a break-even in the 5lh year. Using CBG over gasoline, the end user saves 34% of annual fuel cost which is approximately R47,255 with a payback period of one year and three months for vehicle retrofitting. The fuel prices differential between gasoline and CBG as well as the overall savings, makes CBG attractive to the producer and end user.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWCECS 2015 - World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015
EditorsCraig Douglas, Jon Burgstone, Warren S. Grundfest, Jon Burgstone, Craig Douglas, S. I. Ao
PublisherNewswood Limited
Pages579-588
Number of pages10
Volume2220
ISBN (Electronic)9789881404725
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2015
Event2015 World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, WCECS 2015 - San Francisco, United States
Duration: Oct 21 2015Oct 23 2015

Other

Other2015 World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, WCECS 2015
CountryUnited States
CitySan Francisco
Period10/21/1510/23/15

Fingerprint

Biogas
Economic analysis
Gases
Costs
Processing
Gasoline
Flow rate
Retrofitting
Permeation
Sensitivity analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Masebinu, S. O., Aboyade, A. O., & Muzenda, E. (2015). Economic analysis of biogas upgrading and utilization as vehicular fuel in South Africa. In C. Douglas, J. Burgstone, W. S. Grundfest, J. Burgstone, C. Douglas, & S. I. Ao (Eds.), WCECS 2015 - World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015 (Vol. 2220, pp. 579-588). Newswood Limited.
Masebinu, S. O. ; Aboyade, A. O. ; Muzenda, E. / Economic analysis of biogas upgrading and utilization as vehicular fuel in South Africa. WCECS 2015 - World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015. editor / Craig Douglas ; Jon Burgstone ; Warren S. Grundfest ; Jon Burgstone ; Craig Douglas ; S. I. Ao. Vol. 2220 Newswood Limited, 2015. pp. 579-588
@inproceedings{4954e061125547f99f108d203e126ea7,
title = "Economic analysis of biogas upgrading and utilization as vehicular fuel in South Africa",
abstract = "Economic and sensitivity analysis of a simulated biogas upgrading plant using a gas permeation software has been presented in this study. The effect of three process conditions on gas processing cost (GPC) were simulated. An increase in CO2 increased the GPC from $0.73 to $1.39/m3 of biomethane while an increase in feed pressure increased GPC from $0.65 to $1.16/m3 of biomethane. As the feed flow rate increased from 80-140 m3/h, the product flow rate increased from 46-100 m3/h while the GPC decreases from $0.79 to $0.39/m3 of biomethane. At optimized condition, the calculated GPC was $0.46/m3 of biomethane. The NPV, IRR and BCR for producing biomethane was R15,240,343, 22.41{\%} and 2.0S respectively with a break-even in the 5lh year. Using CBG over gasoline, the end user saves 34{\%} of annual fuel cost which is approximately R47,255 with a payback period of one year and three months for vehicle retrofitting. The fuel prices differential between gasoline and CBG as well as the overall savings, makes CBG attractive to the producer and end user.",
author = "Masebinu, {S. O.} and Aboyade, {A. O.} and E. Muzenda",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "2220",
pages = "579--588",
editor = "Craig Douglas and Jon Burgstone and Grundfest, {Warren S.} and Jon Burgstone and Craig Douglas and Ao, {S. I.}",
booktitle = "WCECS 2015 - World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015",
publisher = "Newswood Limited",

}

Masebinu, SO, Aboyade, AO & Muzenda, E 2015, Economic analysis of biogas upgrading and utilization as vehicular fuel in South Africa. in C Douglas, J Burgstone, WS Grundfest, J Burgstone, C Douglas & SI Ao (eds), WCECS 2015 - World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015. vol. 2220, Newswood Limited, pp. 579-588, 2015 World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, WCECS 2015, San Francisco, United States, 10/21/15.

Economic analysis of biogas upgrading and utilization as vehicular fuel in South Africa. / Masebinu, S. O.; Aboyade, A. O.; Muzenda, E.

WCECS 2015 - World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015. ed. / Craig Douglas; Jon Burgstone; Warren S. Grundfest; Jon Burgstone; Craig Douglas; S. I. Ao. Vol. 2220 Newswood Limited, 2015. p. 579-588.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Economic analysis of biogas upgrading and utilization as vehicular fuel in South Africa

AU - Masebinu, S. O.

AU - Aboyade, A. O.

AU - Muzenda, E.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Economic and sensitivity analysis of a simulated biogas upgrading plant using a gas permeation software has been presented in this study. The effect of three process conditions on gas processing cost (GPC) were simulated. An increase in CO2 increased the GPC from $0.73 to $1.39/m3 of biomethane while an increase in feed pressure increased GPC from $0.65 to $1.16/m3 of biomethane. As the feed flow rate increased from 80-140 m3/h, the product flow rate increased from 46-100 m3/h while the GPC decreases from $0.79 to $0.39/m3 of biomethane. At optimized condition, the calculated GPC was $0.46/m3 of biomethane. The NPV, IRR and BCR for producing biomethane was R15,240,343, 22.41% and 2.0S respectively with a break-even in the 5lh year. Using CBG over gasoline, the end user saves 34% of annual fuel cost which is approximately R47,255 with a payback period of one year and three months for vehicle retrofitting. The fuel prices differential between gasoline and CBG as well as the overall savings, makes CBG attractive to the producer and end user.

AB - Economic and sensitivity analysis of a simulated biogas upgrading plant using a gas permeation software has been presented in this study. The effect of three process conditions on gas processing cost (GPC) were simulated. An increase in CO2 increased the GPC from $0.73 to $1.39/m3 of biomethane while an increase in feed pressure increased GPC from $0.65 to $1.16/m3 of biomethane. As the feed flow rate increased from 80-140 m3/h, the product flow rate increased from 46-100 m3/h while the GPC decreases from $0.79 to $0.39/m3 of biomethane. At optimized condition, the calculated GPC was $0.46/m3 of biomethane. The NPV, IRR and BCR for producing biomethane was R15,240,343, 22.41% and 2.0S respectively with a break-even in the 5lh year. Using CBG over gasoline, the end user saves 34% of annual fuel cost which is approximately R47,255 with a payback period of one year and three months for vehicle retrofitting. The fuel prices differential between gasoline and CBG as well as the overall savings, makes CBG attractive to the producer and end user.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992754314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992754314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84992754314

VL - 2220

SP - 579

EP - 588

BT - WCECS 2015 - World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015

A2 - Douglas, Craig

A2 - Burgstone, Jon

A2 - Grundfest, Warren S.

A2 - Burgstone, Jon

A2 - Douglas, Craig

A2 - Ao, S. I.

PB - Newswood Limited

ER -

Masebinu SO, Aboyade AO, Muzenda E. Economic analysis of biogas upgrading and utilization as vehicular fuel in South Africa. In Douglas C, Burgstone J, Grundfest WS, Burgstone J, Douglas C, Ao SI, editors, WCECS 2015 - World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015. Vol. 2220. Newswood Limited. 2015. p. 579-588