Determination of iron by Z-GFAAS and the influence of short-term precision and long-term precision

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A detailed method validation of graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) with Zeeman background correction was performed. The aim is to perform a detailed investigation of short-term precision as opposed to long-term precision. It was suggested that release of graphite flakes into the light path during measurement significantly influenced the performance of the method. It was found that significant deviations with respect to the certified values were frequent and an estimate of reliable uncertainties was obtained only after a high number of repetitions. Uncertainty of Interlaboratory testing was evaluated as a method to estimate uncertainties that are comparable to uncertainties that were obtained by Interlaboratory testing and to uncertainties predicted by the Horwitz curve. To a large extent, the uncertainty in measurement that was predicted by pooled calibrations corresponded to the uncertainties that were obtained from multiple determinations of unknowns. It was thus proposed that a large proportion of the difference in uncertainty in measurement between laboratories could be explained by properties of the different detectors. In order to support accuracy, it is suggested that a higher level of uncertainty should be accepted in analytical investigations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)194-205
Number of pages12
JournalCentral European Journal of Chemistry
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2014

Fingerprint

Atomic absorption spectrometry
Graphite
Furnaces
Iron
Uncertainty
Testing
Calibration
Detectors

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Materials Chemistry

Cite this

@article{7baa217c299e40a19b9b61e963e35359,
title = "Determination of iron by Z-GFAAS and the influence of short-term precision and long-term precision",
abstract = "A detailed method validation of graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) with Zeeman background correction was performed. The aim is to perform a detailed investigation of short-term precision as opposed to long-term precision. It was suggested that release of graphite flakes into the light path during measurement significantly influenced the performance of the method. It was found that significant deviations with respect to the certified values were frequent and an estimate of reliable uncertainties was obtained only after a high number of repetitions. Uncertainty of Interlaboratory testing was evaluated as a method to estimate uncertainties that are comparable to uncertainties that were obtained by Interlaboratory testing and to uncertainties predicted by the Horwitz curve. To a large extent, the uncertainty in measurement that was predicted by pooled calibrations corresponded to the uncertainties that were obtained from multiple determinations of unknowns. It was thus proposed that a large proportion of the difference in uncertainty in measurement between laboratories could be explained by properties of the different detectors. In order to support accuracy, it is suggested that a higher level of uncertainty should be accepted in analytical investigations.",
author = "Andersen, {Jens E.T.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2478/s11532-013-0362-9",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "194--205",
journal = "Central European Journal of Chemistry",
issn = "1895-1066",
publisher = "Central European Science Journals",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determination of iron by Z-GFAAS and the influence of short-term precision and long-term precision

AU - Andersen, Jens E.T.

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - A detailed method validation of graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) with Zeeman background correction was performed. The aim is to perform a detailed investigation of short-term precision as opposed to long-term precision. It was suggested that release of graphite flakes into the light path during measurement significantly influenced the performance of the method. It was found that significant deviations with respect to the certified values were frequent and an estimate of reliable uncertainties was obtained only after a high number of repetitions. Uncertainty of Interlaboratory testing was evaluated as a method to estimate uncertainties that are comparable to uncertainties that were obtained by Interlaboratory testing and to uncertainties predicted by the Horwitz curve. To a large extent, the uncertainty in measurement that was predicted by pooled calibrations corresponded to the uncertainties that were obtained from multiple determinations of unknowns. It was thus proposed that a large proportion of the difference in uncertainty in measurement between laboratories could be explained by properties of the different detectors. In order to support accuracy, it is suggested that a higher level of uncertainty should be accepted in analytical investigations.

AB - A detailed method validation of graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) with Zeeman background correction was performed. The aim is to perform a detailed investigation of short-term precision as opposed to long-term precision. It was suggested that release of graphite flakes into the light path during measurement significantly influenced the performance of the method. It was found that significant deviations with respect to the certified values were frequent and an estimate of reliable uncertainties was obtained only after a high number of repetitions. Uncertainty of Interlaboratory testing was evaluated as a method to estimate uncertainties that are comparable to uncertainties that were obtained by Interlaboratory testing and to uncertainties predicted by the Horwitz curve. To a large extent, the uncertainty in measurement that was predicted by pooled calibrations corresponded to the uncertainties that were obtained from multiple determinations of unknowns. It was thus proposed that a large proportion of the difference in uncertainty in measurement between laboratories could be explained by properties of the different detectors. In order to support accuracy, it is suggested that a higher level of uncertainty should be accepted in analytical investigations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890486430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890486430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2478/s11532-013-0362-9

DO - 10.2478/s11532-013-0362-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84890486430

VL - 12

SP - 194

EP - 205

JO - Central European Journal of Chemistry

JF - Central European Journal of Chemistry

SN - 1895-1066

IS - 2

ER -