Comparative life cycle analysis for gasification-based hydrogen production systems

M. Muresan, C. C. Cormos, P. S. Agachi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hydrogen is expected to play a significant role in the future energy systems, given the global increase in energy demand, which is driven by the accelerated growth of the world's population, the on-going industrial development and urbanization as well as the higher standards of living and education. In this paper, the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is used to evaluate the environmental impact of two different gasification based hydrogen production technologies: hydrogen production by biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed reactor system (DFB) and hydrogen production by gasification of coal and biomass using entrained flow technology (EF). For both hydrogen production pathways the gasification plant, raw materials production, pre-processing, and transportation are included in the life cycle assessment and also hydrogen delivery to consumers. The DFB cases have lower global warming potential than the EF cases. Also the abiotic depletion fossil potential and the human toxicity potential are lower. The acidification and eutrophication potentials are lower for the EF cases.

Original languageEnglish
Article number013131
JournalJournal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Hydrogen production
Gasification
Life cycle
Biomass
Hydrogen
Eutrophication
Acidification
Global warming
Fluidized beds
Environmental impact
Toxicity
Raw materials
Steam
Education
Coal
Processing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

@article{44879b8a642447e9be09df945b52597f,
title = "Comparative life cycle analysis for gasification-based hydrogen production systems",
abstract = "Hydrogen is expected to play a significant role in the future energy systems, given the global increase in energy demand, which is driven by the accelerated growth of the world's population, the on-going industrial development and urbanization as well as the higher standards of living and education. In this paper, the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is used to evaluate the environmental impact of two different gasification based hydrogen production technologies: hydrogen production by biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed reactor system (DFB) and hydrogen production by gasification of coal and biomass using entrained flow technology (EF). For both hydrogen production pathways the gasification plant, raw materials production, pre-processing, and transportation are included in the life cycle assessment and also hydrogen delivery to consumers. The DFB cases have lower global warming potential than the EF cases. Also the abiotic depletion fossil potential and the human toxicity potential are lower. The acidification and eutrophication potentials are lower for the EF cases.",
author = "M. Muresan and Cormos, {C. C.} and Agachi, {P. S.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1063/1.4864658",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy",
issn = "1941-7012",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "1",

}

Comparative life cycle analysis for gasification-based hydrogen production systems. / Muresan, M.; Cormos, C. C.; Agachi, P. S.

In: Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 013131, 01.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative life cycle analysis for gasification-based hydrogen production systems

AU - Muresan, M.

AU - Cormos, C. C.

AU - Agachi, P. S.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Hydrogen is expected to play a significant role in the future energy systems, given the global increase in energy demand, which is driven by the accelerated growth of the world's population, the on-going industrial development and urbanization as well as the higher standards of living and education. In this paper, the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is used to evaluate the environmental impact of two different gasification based hydrogen production technologies: hydrogen production by biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed reactor system (DFB) and hydrogen production by gasification of coal and biomass using entrained flow technology (EF). For both hydrogen production pathways the gasification plant, raw materials production, pre-processing, and transportation are included in the life cycle assessment and also hydrogen delivery to consumers. The DFB cases have lower global warming potential than the EF cases. Also the abiotic depletion fossil potential and the human toxicity potential are lower. The acidification and eutrophication potentials are lower for the EF cases.

AB - Hydrogen is expected to play a significant role in the future energy systems, given the global increase in energy demand, which is driven by the accelerated growth of the world's population, the on-going industrial development and urbanization as well as the higher standards of living and education. In this paper, the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is used to evaluate the environmental impact of two different gasification based hydrogen production technologies: hydrogen production by biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed reactor system (DFB) and hydrogen production by gasification of coal and biomass using entrained flow technology (EF). For both hydrogen production pathways the gasification plant, raw materials production, pre-processing, and transportation are included in the life cycle assessment and also hydrogen delivery to consumers. The DFB cases have lower global warming potential than the EF cases. Also the abiotic depletion fossil potential and the human toxicity potential are lower. The acidification and eutrophication potentials are lower for the EF cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901819399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901819399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.4864658

DO - 10.1063/1.4864658

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84901819399

VL - 6

JO - Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy

JF - Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy

SN - 1941-7012

IS - 1

M1 - 013131

ER -