Coal-based adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment

Geoffrey S. Simate, N. Maledi, Aoyi Ochieng, S. Ndlovu, Jun Zhang, Lubinda F. Walubita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Coal, just like other fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas, is mainly used as a non-renewable source of energy. It is a physically unique mineral resource almost totally composed of organic matter (carbon), and a smaller percentage of elements such as hydrogen, oxygen, sulphur, and nitrogen. It is believed that underground coal deposits formed about 250–300 million years ago, when much of the Earth was a swamp covered with thick forest and plant growth. This review explores the use of coal, not as an energy source used for generating electricity, but as a low cost adsorbent in water and wastewater treatment processes. In fact, today, coal-based adsorbents still attract considerable interest in their usage. The review critically analyses the chemical composition, ion-exchange and sorption properties of coal. The use of the as-received coals, demineralized coals, sulphonated coals, calcium-loaded coals, chitosan-doped coals, activated carbon, coal fly ash, and coal fly ash derived-zeolite has also been extensively discussed. It is evident from this review that although the pollutant exchange capacities of various types of coal-based adsorbents are significantly lower in comparison to other forms of adsorbents, the substantially lower cost of coal shows a great potential for the utilization of coal as a means to remove a range of pollutants from water and wastewater effluents. However, due to the scarcity of consistent cost information, cost comparisons are difficult to make, and consequently, in this review, such comparisons were not done for the coal-based adsorbents.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2291-2312
JournalJournal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Coal
Water treatment
Wastewater treatment
Adsorbents
water treatment
coal
Coal Ash
wastewater treatment
Fly ash
cost
fly ash
Costs
Water Pollutants
Coal deposits
Zeolites
Mineral resources
Chitosan
pollutant
Fossil fuels
Sulfur

Cite this

Simate, Geoffrey S. ; Maledi, N. ; Ochieng, Aoyi ; Ndlovu, S. ; Zhang, Jun ; Walubita, Lubinda F. / Coal-based adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment. In: Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2016 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 2291-2312.
@article{e36daa49308e4e708de8a59a132a88ac,
title = "Coal-based adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment",
abstract = "Coal, just like other fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas, is mainly used as a non-renewable source of energy. It is a physically unique mineral resource almost totally composed of organic matter (carbon), and a smaller percentage of elements such as hydrogen, oxygen, sulphur, and nitrogen. It is believed that underground coal deposits formed about 250–300 million years ago, when much of the Earth was a swamp covered with thick forest and plant growth. This review explores the use of coal, not as an energy source used for generating electricity, but as a low cost adsorbent in water and wastewater treatment processes. In fact, today, coal-based adsorbents still attract considerable interest in their usage. The review critically analyses the chemical composition, ion-exchange and sorption properties of coal. The use of the as-received coals, demineralized coals, sulphonated coals, calcium-loaded coals, chitosan-doped coals, activated carbon, coal fly ash, and coal fly ash derived-zeolite has also been extensively discussed. It is evident from this review that although the pollutant exchange capacities of various types of coal-based adsorbents are significantly lower in comparison to other forms of adsorbents, the substantially lower cost of coal shows a great potential for the utilization of coal as a means to remove a range of pollutants from water and wastewater effluents. However, due to the scarcity of consistent cost information, cost comparisons are difficult to make, and consequently, in this review, such comparisons were not done for the coal-based adsorbents.",
author = "Simate, {Geoffrey S.} and N. Maledi and Aoyi Ochieng and S. Ndlovu and Jun Zhang and Walubita, {Lubinda F.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.051",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "2291--2312",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering",
issn = "2213-3437",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Coal-based adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment. / Simate, Geoffrey S.; Maledi, N.; Ochieng, Aoyi; Ndlovu, S.; Zhang, Jun; Walubita, Lubinda F.

In: Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2016, p. 2291-2312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coal-based adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment

AU - Simate, Geoffrey S.

AU - Maledi, N.

AU - Ochieng, Aoyi

AU - Ndlovu, S.

AU - Zhang, Jun

AU - Walubita, Lubinda F.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Coal, just like other fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas, is mainly used as a non-renewable source of energy. It is a physically unique mineral resource almost totally composed of organic matter (carbon), and a smaller percentage of elements such as hydrogen, oxygen, sulphur, and nitrogen. It is believed that underground coal deposits formed about 250–300 million years ago, when much of the Earth was a swamp covered with thick forest and plant growth. This review explores the use of coal, not as an energy source used for generating electricity, but as a low cost adsorbent in water and wastewater treatment processes. In fact, today, coal-based adsorbents still attract considerable interest in their usage. The review critically analyses the chemical composition, ion-exchange and sorption properties of coal. The use of the as-received coals, demineralized coals, sulphonated coals, calcium-loaded coals, chitosan-doped coals, activated carbon, coal fly ash, and coal fly ash derived-zeolite has also been extensively discussed. It is evident from this review that although the pollutant exchange capacities of various types of coal-based adsorbents are significantly lower in comparison to other forms of adsorbents, the substantially lower cost of coal shows a great potential for the utilization of coal as a means to remove a range of pollutants from water and wastewater effluents. However, due to the scarcity of consistent cost information, cost comparisons are difficult to make, and consequently, in this review, such comparisons were not done for the coal-based adsorbents.

AB - Coal, just like other fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas, is mainly used as a non-renewable source of energy. It is a physically unique mineral resource almost totally composed of organic matter (carbon), and a smaller percentage of elements such as hydrogen, oxygen, sulphur, and nitrogen. It is believed that underground coal deposits formed about 250–300 million years ago, when much of the Earth was a swamp covered with thick forest and plant growth. This review explores the use of coal, not as an energy source used for generating electricity, but as a low cost adsorbent in water and wastewater treatment processes. In fact, today, coal-based adsorbents still attract considerable interest in their usage. The review critically analyses the chemical composition, ion-exchange and sorption properties of coal. The use of the as-received coals, demineralized coals, sulphonated coals, calcium-loaded coals, chitosan-doped coals, activated carbon, coal fly ash, and coal fly ash derived-zeolite has also been extensively discussed. It is evident from this review that although the pollutant exchange capacities of various types of coal-based adsorbents are significantly lower in comparison to other forms of adsorbents, the substantially lower cost of coal shows a great potential for the utilization of coal as a means to remove a range of pollutants from water and wastewater effluents. However, due to the scarcity of consistent cost information, cost comparisons are difficult to make, and consequently, in this review, such comparisons were not done for the coal-based adsorbents.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.051

DO - 10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.051

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 2291

EP - 2312

JO - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

JF - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

SN - 2213-3437

IS - 2

ER -